- reduce the word count but build consultative revisions into the full assignment.
- in small groups, exchange draughts, offer oral critique, and work up an edit schema.
- use alternatives to the scholarly essay form.
- varieties of "take away student autonomy & set minute criteria in stone."
From the Instructorial perspective, all the ideas reduce neatly to two simple dicta:
- "Use office hours."
- "Chose a topic from what excites, angers, puzzles or impresses you in the course material."
Don't try to be scholarly when you conceive the assignment. Look back on the course and find something that engages you for whatever reason. Then, find the tightest and most concrete idea possible and turn it into a thesis: "I think this is true." Draught in roughest form an introductory paragraph, or simply sketch a plan of development in point form on a sheet of paper and bring in to an Office Hour for consultation.
The form that the paper will take is then open for mutual agreement. The venerable canons of scholarship provide a scale of formal expression that gives wide scope for creativity & inspiration. Again, the type to which the paper adheres is settled during the individual consultation that Office Hours allow.
On the matter of secondary sources, my dictum is that connection with an established body and tradition of scholarhip is what elevates us above journalism. A classfellow sends along the following advice, given by Dr. Kate Scheel:
1. Present my own idea regarding the question / thesis / course work etc.
2. Find a [related] textual example .... from the course
books.
3. Support this idea with a secondary resource [researched in the Library stacks.]I am keeping [thus] my own voice, providing appropriate examples, and crediting my work through scholarly examples. This may seem trivial ... however, I know many people to whom this was [....never] clearly and simply explained.
No comments:
Post a Comment